Gout Pal Interactive

Your definitions seem OK to me, but in practice they seem to get confused. I've seen secondary gout quoted when it is identified after another disease, but no link established.

Logically, if gout is secondary to some other condition, then treating that condition will cure the gout. If the other condition cannot be treated, then uric acid lowering (usually allopurinol) is the answer.

One significant point is that treating the primary condition may not be a complete answer. We've discussed elsewhere how gout attacks are much more likely to happen once you get uric acid crystals in your body.

cjeezy,

Interesting idea but I think the lines betweeen the two get fuzzy. I am CERTAIN my gout was secondary to overuse of thiazide diuretics but then the question remains, is there a hereditary proclivity that ALLOWED the secondary gout where someone else might have eaten the same tons of thiazide and never got gout.

As for recognizing the secondary quality of gout it might not be so simple to remove its cause. Problem arises from the seeming fact that once uric acid is laid down in joints it is almost impossible to be completely free of it and thus it may be indistinguishable from PRIMARY gout forevermore.

Or perhaps what they thought were very rare gout attacks were something else. I think gout attacks tend to breed gout attacks and would consider someone with just one or two real gout attacks a decade a rarity indeed.