Welcome to GoutPal’s Gout Forum. Anyone can post here – there is no need to register, though I can’t see why you wouldn’t all you need to do is register.
If you want to find answers quickly, please try this search:
… Or Post & Learn Even More
“Every time you respond to someone here, more people see the helpfulness, and they are encouraged to contribute. First with questions, but then with advice and support. It is a wonderful thing to see, and be part of. The diversity of views is very special, and I feel that this is only achievable through continuing natural growth”
This is the kind of spirit unique only to Gout Pal Interactive!
Hi, guys. I’m middle aged and just getting over my 3rd bout of gout in 10 years. I have had a long gap since my last attack, at least 5 years – can’t remember exactly, but certainly a while ago.
This time the whole thing has upset me more than before, so have done more reading about the condition. The gout always come only in my big toe. This one was very painful for about 3 days and then went down quickly. It still looks a bit swollen, but I’m not in pain now, nor am I limping.
I am not overweight, pretty fit (gym 3 times a week, plus like to walk, cycle and golf) and eat healthily. However, frustratingly, it appears from my reading that the things which should be doing me good are actually doing me harm. Can that be right ?
Diet. I eat pretty much anything, I’m not faddy. But am lucky that I enjoy healthy things best. So, red meat only occasionally, lots of fish (including oily fish), chicken, veg, salads, some seafood, beans etc. So when reading what’s bad for me, its that fish, its those prawns, its lentils and spinach and asparagus, I feel frustrated. (One of our favourite meals is salmon with lentils and spinach. That should be good for me, but it seems it isn’t).
Exercise. I like a good workout, a good sweat. I tend to push myself a bit. That’s good for me – except it seems it isn’t, strenuous exercise can cause gout.
OK, a confession, I drink alcohol. Probably a little above the 21 units per week, but not massively above. Probably 3, or at most 4 pints of beer a week, the rest red or white wine.
My GP is to do a blood test in about 3 weeks when things settle (first one). He doesn’t recommend Allipurinol after 3 attacks in 10 years; he thinks it may be years till I have another one. I tend to agree about the drugs and prefer, if possible to change diet a little more and cut out a few of the drinks. I’ve started to do that, plus cherry extract drink every day.
Any thoughts ? Once things settle I can see that I’ll forget about it and get back to my old bad (or good ?) habits. Is that a mistake ?
Is drinking 2 pints of beer in one session asking for trouble, or is it only when you have, say, 5 pints ? I appreciate that we should monitor when we get the attacks and what we have been doing/eating/drinking, but I haven’t had enough attacks to get much of an idea.
Is there any way I can tell if I am doing permanent joint damage ?
My view is that if I start having more frequent attacks, then allipurinol will start to look very attractive. I really can’t see the attraction of reducing my eating pleasure, especially as it’s a healthy diet, if I can take a relatively safe drug. Is that a bad attitude ?
It's a huge mistake to manage gout by simply controlling pain, or by using pain to assess the progress of gout.
3 attacks in 10 years does not sound much, but if uric acid levels are high, then crystals can still form slowly without a typical acute gout flare.
There are developing techniques in ultrasound and other non-invasive scanning technologies to assess joint damage. Unfortunately, these are not widespread, though it is always worth asking a local rheumatologist to see if you are lucky enough to have access.
Assuming, like most people, you cannot assess joint damage easily, the safest approach is to recognize that you are at risk of joint damage. Therefore you need to do something about it, now.
Your GP is doing you a huge disservice by waiting for more frequent attacks before doing something. The fact that you have had gout in the past puts you in a high risk group for joint damage. The only way to avoid such damage is to get uric acid below 6mg/dL, and keep it there.
Without proper monitoring and control of uric acid, you end up in the place where you worry about everything and how it might be affecting your gout. Your goal should be to lead a reasonably healthy life, without having to worry about the type of details you mention.
Exercise is certainly good for you. Whilst it can raise uric acid in the short term, regular exercise should lower uric acid in the long term. Your diet sounds healthy to me, so I would suggest keeping your healthy lifestyle, and managing your uric acid levels. Too much is made of individual food items, and other factors such as genetics and environment (especially temperature) play a much greater part.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
8:21 am September 3, 2009
nokka
Guest
3
Thanks for the reply, Gout Pal.
Like you, I live in Yorkshire and my GP is a straight-talking Yorkshireman. Probably think a bit of pain will do you good
To be fair, at least he's sent me for a blood test, which will at least give us a uric acid reading and then we can go from there. I have thought a lot about my diet in recent days and have made some changes, which I don't think will cause me much grief. Having said that, the thought of a restricted diet doesn't fill me with joy, either.
I have a couple of concerns. Firstly, I am to travel abroad for several months towards the end of this year, to SE Asia. I am a bit worried about what will happen if I'm struck with a series of attacks there. I have wondered whether I would be best taking allipurinol now so reducing the likelihood of further attacks whilst away. Also, on this point, I note allipurinol is taken for life. I'm a bit confused by this; if the drug gets your uric acid levels down to below 5, why can't you then stop and see whether you can control acid levels with diet ? At least you will have cleared all the embedded crystals, so you should be Ok going forward. Or am I missing something ?
No, nokka, you haven't missed anything. This is exactly the right thing to do, but it is rarely viewed that way.
Usual advice is to try diet & exercise, and if that doesn't work, start allopurinol. It makes much more sense to start allopurinol (or other uric acid lowering therapy) immediately, as this protects you from excess urate whilst you are improving your lifestyle.
If I were you, I'd get the uric acid lowered now. It takes a few months to dissolve old crystals, which can cause a gout flare. Get this out of the way before you travel.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
4:33 am September 4, 2009
nokka
Guest
5
Thanks, Gout Pal. I'll wait and see what the blood test says and have a longer chat with my GP.
To be honest, though we can all improve our diets a bit, I think mine is generally very good now. Plus I do quite a lot of exercise. (At the moment only swimming). I am fortunate in that my wife is an excellent cook and very interested in nutrition stuff. Last night, for example, we had trout (probably not good), but had it with butternut squash and millet. Millet is apparently alkaline and should, in theory, be good for gout. We reckon balance like that could be the way forward. I have also started to have some flax seeds sprinkled on my cereal in the morning – also apparently really good for inflammation.
It is possible my relatively good diet has saved me from more gout flares over the years. Who knows. Having said that, I have never considered before whether something is good or bad for gout. I have eaten everything I've wanted eg high levels of seafood at times, a steak or lamb if desired, beer – or sometimes all these things – and not had any gout for at least 5 years.
Perhaps it was just a strange combination in the week leading up to this flare which did it. I had had a tin of mackerel one day; we'd eaten fresh sardines one night; we'd had a burger (unusual) one night, plus the usual chicken, lentils, kidney beans, some beer and wine ALL in the week prior to the attack. Plus I'd been doing some pretty strenuous workouts. Maybe that combo tippled me over the edge.
I guess the blood test may tell me more. I'll let you know how I get on.
I often find it difficult to know where to draw the line on diet for gout.
On the one hand, many people stress the importance of purine control. On several other hands there are arguments that calorie control, iron control, hydration, avoiding fasting or bingeing, and acid/alkali balance are equally, or more, important.
Much depends on the individual. Calorie control might be vital to one person, but not important to another. Purine control might be more important to a uric acid over-producer than it is to an under-excreter. Etcetera, etcetera.
A further complication is the contribution of anti-inflammatory foods. Lots of fruit and vegetables might have little effect on uric acid, but might make one naturally less resistant to inflammation, and thus less affected by accumulation of uric acid deposits.
We all come from different starting points. We all have different attitudes to the acceptability of daily medication. We all have different degrees of diet restriction that we find acceptable.
There is no “one size fits all” solution, except that, whatever you do, gout management only makes sense when you know your uric acid level, and do whatever suits you best to keep it under 6mg/dL.
Had Chilon of Sparta asked: “What is best for gout?” The Oracle's reply, “Know thyself,” is still completely appropriate.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
7:05 am September 4, 2009
nokka
Guest
7
Know thyself, indeed. Add in lashings of common sense as well.
The diet charts seem to me to be all over the place. They contain contradictions and don't properly give guidance. For example, there is one chart which lists all foods and gives a supposed purine content per 100g. Anchovies look really bad – having avery high level. I have no doubt that that is the case, but it is extremely unlikely that you would eat huge portions of anchovies. We eat anchovies sometimes, but I bet we wouldn't eat more than about 20g in one go. Beef, on the other hand, someone may eat a 12oz steak !
I've always rather liked the saying 'Everything in moderation — including moderation'.
At this stage, allipurinol looks a temporary possiblity for me. I have no real problem with taking a medication if the alternative is worse. I also don't really fancy the idea of my sabbatical in SE Asia being spoilt by having to constantly watch what I eat, or indeed having flare ups.
All depends on those blood tests, of course, which I still have to wait a couple of weeks for.
7:22 am September 4, 2009
zip2play
Member
posts 1213
8
We must remember that ALL the food proscriptions and prescriptions came from before the days of allopurinol and probenecid and they served to fill a need for doing SOMETHING even in the face of a nearly intractable disease with disfigurement and death as the common endpoint…that is human nature. Whether ANY of them works is subject to skeptical debate.
Look at it this way, would you today deny a teenage diabetic his daily insulin because long before insulin they practiced the ketogenenic diet (all fat, little protein and NO carbohydrates) which kept the poor kid alive until he turned 20. Would you use talismans, prayers, and smoke to cure a modern case of bubonic plague, or copper bracelets to cure arthritis. Cherries, baking soda, no fish, no beer, no lentils or organ meats all fall close to the same kinds of treatments, they were better than nothing, but just barely, AND they got you to pay some quack, priest, or shaman some money.
noka,
Don't look at allopurinol as a temporizing measure to be used for trips abroad, or for a short time til LIFESTYLE kicks in. If you plan to use it that way it is better done without because going on an off is SURE to cause more problems than it helps.
On the matter of using it “until all the deposits are gone” I am reasonably convinced that after several attacks the deposits will NEVER be completely gone. Eventually one of those colorful PET scans will prove this. THere will ALWAYS be residual crystals walled off by the body and invisible to the bloodstream…MOST of the time, but rest assured they will peak out occasionally and present a site for easy crystallization of new uric acid.
In your favor, 3 attacks in 10 years is something that shouuld be MONITORED, not treated. If they start increasing to 2 or 3 a year or even one crippling attack a year, then you'll need to reexamine allopurinol. For your months abroad, make sure you take a bottle of a good analgesic…colchicine if possible, although in truth Southeast Asian doctors might be more adept at dealing with gout than Western practitioners who are more impressed with the “machine that goes 'BING'!”
Is there any way I can tell if I am doing permanent joint damage ?
Be assured that EVERY attack causes scarring and some permanent joint damage; whether it is grossly obvious or not depends on the severity and length of the attack.
7:51 am September 4, 2009
nokka
Guest
9
Thanks for your input, zip. The time you guys give up to post here is absolutely appreciated. I'm sure all who look at the site agree with me.
I take on board the advice you both give and will remain open minded. I confess I am a little impatient to know my blood test score, so that I know where I am. Another 2 weeks to go, I reckon, which should hopefully see some stability. At present my toe remains stubbornly slightly inflamed. The main part of the attack only lasted about 3 days, but the slight inflammation has dragged on – its 2 weeks today that the flare started.
9:25 am September 21, 2009
nokka
Guest
10
Hi, guys. I have been today for my blood test and have a doctors appointment for next monday for the results.
Couple of things: The slight inflammation and tenderness is continuing. In fact, over the weekend it got a bit worse. I woke in the middle of the night friday (quite usual these days with all the water being drunk ) and the toe felt pretty stiff and a bit fizzy. I lay there thinking 'Oh no, please don't let this be another full blown attack'. Anyway, it remained a a bit like that through saturday and sunday, though today its back to its normal low level tenderness. My understanding is that the blood test should only be done once the attack has stabilised (4 weeks since the attack now). Do you think the blood test could be affected by this ?
It seems I can move from the toe being almost completely normal, to feeling it quite a lot – in quite a short space of time. Doesn't seem there is any rhyme nor reason to it – no obvious trigger. Is that the way it is ? Plus I think I get slight tingly, almost neuralgic tingling in my knee or sometimes elsewhere for a second or two sometimes. Its very slight and sometimes I wonder whether I've imagined it. Any thoughts ?
Finally, as regards allipurinol. My question above regarding whether I should take allipurinol for a time to get my uric levels down met with different responses. GoutPal thought that sounded a good idea; zip clearly felt that could be harmful. I'm interested in what way that could be considered a harmful thing to do ?
Perfect description of gout, nokka. Though the “typical gout experience” is devastating pain that wears off by itself in 2 to 4 days, I'd wager that typical is only a small percent.
The longer you've had it the more permanent the effects are. Instead of pain-free most of the time with occasional flares, you move to lingering attacks, permanent discomfort and constant worry, with more frequent flares.
The answer is to keep your uric acid level below 6mg/dL. I do not want to put words into zip2play's typing fingers, but I interpret what he wrote to mean – do not expect it to work if you are not prepared to see it as a lifetime commitment.
Logic says you might get to a point where you can drop uric acid lowering therapy, but experience says this is a small minority. It doesn't matter – get on the allopurinol, control the uric acid, THEN think about other issues.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
10:39 am September 28, 2009
nokka
Guest
12
Hi, got my blood test results today. The results weren't in mg/dl as I was expecting, but in umo/l.
The result was 467 umo/l, which the doctor said was just outside the normal range and were pretty good for someone who just had an acute attack. He has requested another blood test to be done in 3 to 4 weeks and to see how they are then.
He feels that as I've only had 3 attacks in 10 years and the levels aren't really high I needn't go on allipurinol as yet. He feels we need to continue to monitor levels. He feels that if the level remains a bit high we would still have few weeks to start allipurinol at 100mg before I go to South East Asia.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
6:19 am September 30, 2009
nokka
Guest
14
The doctor I saw is the best in the practice, in my view. It transpires that his brother has gout, so he knows quite a bit about it.
His point is that from a clinical viewpoint you don't start to treat with allipurinol unless one of 3 things are in place: 1. the uric acid level is very high 2. you have had 2 or more gout attacks in last 12 months or 3. there is evidence of joint damage. In his view, none of those conditions are yet met, so he advises that I wait and see. He feels it could be another 5 years before I have another attack.
It is clear that I am susceptible to gout, but the attacks are rare. It may be that in normal circumstances my body can cope; it is only when a combination of factors come together that causes the trigger. To be honest, before this latest attack I had almost completely forgotten that I'd had gout in the past. I have never limited my diet or lifestyle in any way, sometimes having quite high levels of the things which are notorious for bringing on attacks – without any problem for at least 5 years.
So, for now, I think I'll take the Doc's advice and see what happens. I have another blood test in about 3 weeks, so we'll see what that says. I'm going to keep my fingers crossed and hope another attack doesn't happen soon. If it does, that's when I'll take the allipurinol route.
Wish me luck.
1:10 pm September 30, 2009
zip2play
Member
posts 1213
15
nokka,
Assume that I am answering without having seen your previous post (it isn't up yet.)
In light of the 7.85 uric acid which most likely was higher before the attack started you must ask yourself a couple questions:
1. How painful were the first three days of that attack?
2. How annnoying were the last 2 weeks?
3. Do I want to risk the same thing happening in 3 months?
4. Do I think it is likely?
After answering those questions you have the big FINALE: Do I want to wait until the next attack and then begin allopurinol or begin it now. It is possible there will never be another attack, it is possible that it may come in 3 months, or in 3 weeks or in three years. A lot of this last answer depends on your answer to questions #1 an #2.
You are in good company because MILLIONS of people have had to make this same decision. Nobody has the perfect answer to “How many gout attacks is one too many?” Do NOT let your doctor make it for you because, and I repeat myself, allopurinol IS forever; you neither want to rush into treatment nor delay inititating it.
For myself, I could have suffered with an attack every quarter like the first three I had, they were merely crippling, but my FOURTH attack was a visitation from Hades that no human should suffer. Sawing off my foot without anaesthesia would have brought comparative relief. THAT made my decision.
I firmly believe that non-invasive scanning methods will improve in sophistication and availability. I hope to see the day when an annual full body scan to check joints, heart, lungs, digestive tract etc is a standard routine.
When that time comes, and high uric acid gets treated at the first sign of tendon and cartilage damage, the medics will comment “Do you remember the time when they used to wait for the pain to get too bad before they treated this?”
In fact, we can see the results now from early DECT scans and it is clear that damage is being done much earlier than was previously the case:
In addition, the study also provided new information on the presence of subclinical tophi and the accumulation of monosodium urate crystal deposits in clinically challenging anatomic regions. “To our surprise, the study showed that uric acid can be initially deposited in tendons and ligaments near and within the knee joint, ankle joint ,wrist , ie in the collateral ligament / cruciate ligament and deep flexor tendons of the wrist”, says Dr. Nicolaou. “This is very important to know, since these deposits can increase the susceptibility of tendons and ligaments for tears. If we are able to detect the disease in an early stage, we can initiate a treatment to prevent destruction of the tendons and ligaments and joints where subclinical tophi are present.”
Science is moving on to help gout sufferers. Sadly, few doctors are keeping in step. My specific answer to point 3 of nokka's doctor is that it is now abundantly clear that one gout flare is evidence of joint damage. Not proof, I admit, but not statistical risk either. It is strong evidence.
Why, I wonder, do doctors spend so much time, effort and money addressing other preventative health issues, e.g. high blood pressure, where risk is statistical, yet insist on waiting for proof of joint damage before acting on gout.
In fact, the evidence has grown stronger this year. Dalbeth, as long ago as 2005, showed how tophi grow into the bone, causing permanent joint damage. Earlier this year, Carter and colleagues looked at seemingly unaffected joints of gout patients who had at least one clearly damaged joint (erosion detected by normal x-ray). Using MRI scans they found that as well as bone damage, there were problems with bone marrow, connective tissues and surrounding soft tissues. In seemingly unaffected joints they found similar problems, mainly with bone marrow and connective tissue. Note that these are the standard MRI scans, not the DECT scans that show urate deposits.
Gout is a progressive, debilitating disease. The sooner you get uric acid levels down, the less damage you cause.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
11:00 am October 1, 2009
nokka
Guest
17
It's an interesting consideration; how many gout attacks do we bear and over what period before going onto allipurinol. zip, you mention 4 attacks. Over what period were those attacks ? GP, same question – how many and over what period ? (indeed, anybody else ?)
It isn't an easy thing to decide. After all, most of us would prefer not to have to take medication for the rest of our lives, right ? I'm sure the drug is relatively safe, but still. Plus the Doc (whose opinions I respect) says we need to monitor, not treat, at this stage. Things I read suggest that is generally the received medical opinion at present: The Oxford Textbook of Medicine 2005 says:
'Although plasma is saturated with monosodium urate at a concentration of 7.0 mg/dl, higher concentrations of urate can remain in a stable supersaturated solution in plasma without producing any symptoms. Ignoring the slight asymetry of the frequency distribution and defining normality as the mean value + or – 2 standard deviations from the mean, normal values of 7.0 mg/dl for men …has been widely adopted. This has led to considerable overtreatment of patients who have quite innocuous plasma urate concentrations'
Sorry, can't do the link for this as its on google books. I found it when I googled 'gout' (on google's UK site). It comes up on the first page.
11:04 am October 1, 2009
nokka
Guest
18
Apologies – I actually googled 'umol/l gout'. It comes top.
I… the Doc (whose opinions I respect) says we need to monitor, not treat, at this stage. Things I read suggest that is generally the received medical opinion at present: The Oxford Textbook of Medicine 2005 says:
'Although plasma is saturated with monosodium urate at a concentration of 7.0 mg/dl, higher concentrations of urate can remain in a stable supersaturated solution in plasma without producing any symptoms. Ignoring the slight asymetry of the frequency distribution and defining normality as the mean value + or – 2 standard deviations from the mean, normal values of 7.0 mg/dl for men …has been widely adopted. This has led to considerable overtreatment of patients who have quite innocuous plasma urate concentrations'
Sorry, can't do the link for this as its on google books. I found it when I googled 'gout' (on google's UK site). It comes up on the first page.
Don't worry too much about including links to published works such as books and scientific journals. The year of publication plus the book or journal & article title is enough to find it.
I agree wholeheartedly with your suggestion that this is generally the received medical opinion at present. I can also understand why. The first use of MRI scans didn't take place until near the end of last century, and advances like DECT are very new. It will take time for the impact of these developments to affect suggested best practice – and even that will take a long time to reach primary health care providers. Gout is not generally recognised as a serious disease, and so serious measures are not believed to be justified. Unfortunately, there do not seem to be any studies reporting the effects of long-term aymptomatic hyperuricemia.
Monitoring may well be your only option, so I suggest regular uric acid testing. Also consider whatever lifestyle improvements you can make to keep the level as low as you can. It would also be beneficial to take the 24 hour urine test to assess if you are a uric acid over-producer or under-excreter.
Unless replying to specific points in this topic, please start a new topic. See new topic link above, or gout forum guidelines. Current gout status in my profile.
10:33 am October 4, 2009
zip2play
Member
posts 1213
20
Post edited 3:36 pm – October 4, 2009 by zip2play
'Although plasma is saturated with monosodium urate at a concentration of 7.0 mg/dl, higher concentrations of urate can remain in a stable supersaturated solution in plasma
The fly in the ointment is that supersaturation by definition is a solution that has more solute than can be normally held. It is “broken” when the first crystal forms…then the solution goes to normal saturation with the instantaneous release of crystals. Dropping the tiniest crystal into a supersaturated solution will INSTANTLY crystallize it.
Thus supresaturation is only possible for a person who has NEVER had a gout attack. ONE attack and you have gout rendering supersaturation impossible. A person with gout CANNOT hold a 7 mg/dL UA in solution.
Too many doctors have forgotten their high school chem classes. Without rrealizing how stupid it is what they are actually saying is